> On 31 Aug 2016, at 15:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>> When SSL renegotiation was removed in 426746b9 the only consumer of the 
>> openssl
>> specific count member in the Port struct was removed, but the member was left
>> together with a few updates to it which are unused.  Attached patch removes 
>> the
>> leftovers which now serves no purpose unless I’m missing something.
> Hm, well, we can't remove those case labels as control would then end
> up in the default case which throws an error.  

Doh, I’ll go stand in the corner.

> But otherwise this seems
> sound.  Without renegotiation the count is not very useful anyway
> since it's likely to overflow (at least if long is 32 bits).

Yeah. Thanks for applying.

cheers ./daniel

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to