On 20 August 2016 at 15:04, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 20/08/16 16:01, Craig Ringer wrote: >> >> On 5 June 2016 at 09:54, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com >> <mailto:david.g.johns...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On Thursday, March 17, 2016, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com >> <mailto:cr...@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote: >> >> The first patch was incorrectly created on top of failover slots >> not HEAD. Attached patch applies on HEAD. >> >> >> Lots of logical decoding work ongoing but this one shows as active >> in the September cf and the comments by Craig indicate potential >> relevance to 9.6. Is this still live as-is or has it been subsumed >> by other threads? >> >> >> >> Yes. Both those patches are still pending and should be considered for >> commit in the next CF. (Of course, I think they should just be >> committed, but I would, wouldn't I?) >> >> > > I think the doc one should definitely go in and possibly be back-patched all > the way to 9.4. I didn't look at the other one.
I agree the doc patch should go in, though I suggest reword it slightly, like attached patch. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers