On 03/09/16 18:04, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 02/09/16 22:57, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The new system catalog pg_publication_rel has columns pubid, relid,
and does not use the customary column name prefixes. Maybe that is OK
here. I can't actually think of a naming scheme that wouldn't make
things worse.
Yeah, well I could not either and thee are some catalogs that don't use
the prefixes so I figured it's probably not big deal.
The ones that don't are not models to be emulated. They are cases
where somebody ignored project convention and it wasn't caught until
too late.
Okay but if I follow the convention the names of those fields would be
something like pubrelpubid and pubrelrelid which does not seem like
improvement to me. Maybe the catalog should be pg_publication_map then
as that would make it seem less ugly although less future proof (as
we'll want to add more things to publications than just tables and they
might need different catalogs).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
