On 4 September 2016 at 14:32, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > At 2016-09-04 07:02:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: >> >> > By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch >> > adding the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread. >> > Perhaps that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring >> > potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind >> > much. Just that's worth mentioning. >> >> Hmm, that was unintentional. If something stalls the recovery >> parameter project, please remind me to commit that as well. > > I'm aware of this, and will adjust accordingly in the GUC patch. Thanks > for the heads up.
I noticed we don't mention what LSN is anywhere, so I'd like to apply the following doc patch also. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
doc_lsn.v1.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
