On 4 September 2016 at 14:32, Abhijit Menon-Sen <a...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> At 2016-09-04 07:02:01 +0100, si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>> > By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch
>> > adding the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread.
>> > Perhaps that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring
>> > potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind
>> > much. Just that's worth mentioning.
>> Hmm, that was unintentional. If something stalls the recovery
>> parameter project, please remind me to commit that as well.
> I'm aware of this, and will adjust accordingly in the GUC patch. Thanks
> for the heads up.

I noticed we don't mention what LSN is anywhere, so I'd like to apply
the following doc patch also.

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment: doc_lsn.v1.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to