(Just remembered to remove pgsql-committers here). On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> wrote: > * Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Christian Ullrich <ch...@chrullrich.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> * Michael Paquier wrote: > >>>> In order to avoid any problems with the load and unload windows, my >>>> bet goes for 0001, 0002 and 0003, with the last two patches merged >>>> together, 0001 being only a set of independent fixes. That's ugly, but >>>> that looks the safest course of actions. I have rebased/rewritten the >>>> patches as attached. Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> In lieu of convincing you to drop the entire thing, yes, that looks about >>> right, except for the BOOL thing. >> >> >> Yes, right. Thanks. Patch 0001 is definitely something that should be >> applied and backpatched, the CloseHandle() call is buggy. Now 0002 and >> 0003 are improving things, but there have been no reports regarding >> problems in this area, so this could just be applied to master I >> guess. Christian, does that sound right? > > Yes.
OK, let's get to the next step of the game and get a committer to look at this patch. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers