On 7 September 2016 at 13:47, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Fix VACUUM_TRUNCATE_LOCK_WAIT_INTERVAL >> >> lazy_truncate_heap() was waiting for >> VACUUM_TRUNCATE_LOCK_WAIT_INTERVAL, but in microseconds >> not milliseconds as originally intended. > > Don't we need to back-patch this?
If we do then a database-wide VACUUM on a busy database will take substantially longer than it does now. That may not be perceived as a "fix" by everybody, so we should not do it without an explicit agreement by many. Thoughts? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
