Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> IIRC, the SET does *not* start a transaction,
> > Yes but doesn't autocommit-off mode mean that
> > it implicitly begins a transaction in suitable
> > places ? For example, 'set autocommit to off;
> > declare .. cursor ..' works though it never
> > work without BEGIN under autocommit-on mode.
> But the DECLARE would start a transaction --- AFAIR,

Yes it's only because the behavior is useful for us.

So isn't the problem if the warning message for 
   'set autocommit to off;commit'
is useful or not ?
IMHO it's rather a harmful message.

Hiroshi Inoue

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Reply via email to