On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That particular case I believe is using work_mem=4MB, easy strings, 1.5GB 
> table.

Cool. I wonder where this leaves Heikki's draft patch, that completely
removes batch memory, etc.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to