On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
> Wow, this is really cool. We should do something like this for query
> execution too.

We should certainly do this for tuplestore.c, too. I've been meaning
to adopt it to use batch memory. I did look at it briefly, and recall
that it was surprisingly awkward because a surprisingly large number
of callers want to have memory that they can manage independently of
the lifetime of their tuplestore.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to