On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The fact that the pg_stat_replication view does show walsender processes > seems like possibly a reasonable argument for not showing them in > pg_stat_activity. But we'd have to do some rejiggering of the view > definition to make that happen.
We may actually had better show WAL sender processes in pg_stat_activity. An argument in favor of that is the tracking of WaitEventSet events (or latches if you want). -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
