On 09/15/2016 01:33 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: >>>> For COPY, I think perhaps it would be more logical to put the new note >>>> immediately after the third note which describes the privileges >>>> required, since it's kind of related, and then we can talk about the >>>> RLS policies required, e.g.: >>>> >>>> If row-level security is enabled for the table, COPY table TO is >>>> internally converted to COPY (SELECT * FROM table) TO, and the >>>> relevant security policies are applied. Currently, COPY FROM is not >>>> supported for tables with row-level security. >>> >>> This sounds better than what I had, so I will do it that way. >> >> Apologies for the delay, but new patch attached. Assuming no more >> comments, will commit this, backpatched to 9.5, in a day or two. > > I don't think this was ever committed, but my comment is that it seems > to be exposing rather more of the implementation than is probably > wise. Can't we say that SELECT policies will apply rather than saying > that it is internally converted to a SELECT?
I've not committed it yet because I was going to look into the new info Dean mentioned first. Seems like your wording is fine, so will make that change. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
