Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lat...@gmail.com> writes: > I agree with the argument in this thread, having "Source code" as part > of \df+ is bit annoying, specifically when output involve some really > big PL language functions. Having is separate does make \df+ output more > readable. So I would vote for \df++ rather then adding the source code > as part of footer for \df+.
If it's unreadable in \df+, how would \df++ make that any better? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers