On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> My original patch added code to manage the files for 2 phase
>> transactions opened by the local server on the remote servers. This
>> code was mostly inspired from the code in twophase.c which manages the
>> file for prepared transactions. The logic to manage 2PC files has
>> changed since  and has been optimized. One of the things I wanted
>> to do is see, if those optimizations are applicable here as well. Have
>> you considered that?
> Yeah, we're considering it.
> After these changes are committed, we will post the patch incorporated
> these changes.
> But what we need to do first is the discussion in order to get consensus.
> Since current design of this patch is to transparently execute DCL of
> 2PC on foreign server, this code changes lot of code and is
Can you please elaborate. I am not able to understand what DCL is
involved here. According to , examples of DCL are GRANT and REVOKE
> Another approach I have is to push down DCL to only foreign servers
> that support 2PC protocol, which is similar to DML push down.
> This approach would be more simpler than current idea and is easy to
> use by distributed transaction manager.
Again, can you please elaborate, how that would be different from the
current approach and how does it simplify the code.
The Postgres Database Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: