Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> writes: > This patch applies with a few minor offsets, compiles without > warning, and passes all regression tests including `make > check-world` with TAP tests enabled. This and the related patch > dealing with the parallel API definitely make things cleaner and > easier to follow.
OK, thanks for reviewing! > I find it disappointing that ACLs continue to be held back as a > fourth step outside the framework of the "normal" ordering. That > is an ugly hack, which makes it impossible to, for example, create > a fifth step to create indexes on materialized views and refresh > them in anything resembling a clean fashion. Would it make sense > to deal with the ACL ordering hack in one of these patches, or > should that be left for later? Seems like material for some other patch. It would be greatly more invasive than what I have here, I fear, and probably require some fundamental design work. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers