On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello, I return to this before my things:)
> Though I haven't played with the patch yet..

Be sure to run the test cases in the patch or base your tests on them then!

> Though I don't know how it actually impacts the perfomance, it
> seems to me that we can live with truncated_to and sync_above in
> RelationData and BufferNeedsWAL(rel, buf) instead of
> HeapNeedsWAL(rel, buf).  Anyway up to one entry for one relation
> seems to exist at once in the hash.

TBH, I still think that the design of this patch as proposed is pretty
cool and easy to follow.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to