On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Hello, I return to this before my things:) > > Though I haven't played with the patch yet..
Be sure to run the test cases in the patch or base your tests on them then! > Though I don't know how it actually impacts the perfomance, it > seems to me that we can live with truncated_to and sync_above in > RelationData and BufferNeedsWAL(rel, buf) instead of > HeapNeedsWAL(rel, buf). Anyway up to one entry for one relation > seems to exist at once in the hash. TBH, I still think that the design of this patch as proposed is pretty cool and easy to follow. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers