On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9/23/16 9:28 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>> Document to what extent other relation types are supported (e.g., >>> > materialized views as source, view or foreign table or temp table as >>> > target). Suggest an updatable view as target if user wants to have >>> > different table names or write into a different table structure. >>> > >> I don't think that's good suggestion, for one it won't work for UPDATEs >> as we have completely different path for finding the tuple to update >> which only works on real data, not on view. I am thinking of even just >> allowing table to table replication in v1 tbh, but yes it should be >> documented what target relation types can be. > > I'll generalize this then to: Determine which relation types should be > supported at either end, document that, and then make sure it works that > way. A restrictive implementation is OK for the first version, as long > as it keeps options open.
The newest patch is 3-week old, so marking this entry as returned with feedback. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
