Hi, On 2016-10-05 14:01:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I think what is happening is that there are circular assumptions that end > up trying to implement a spinlock in terms of a spinlock, or otherwise > somehow recursively use the process's semaphore. It's a bit hard to tell > though because the atomics code is such an underdocumented rat's nest of > #ifdefs.
I don't think that should be the case, but I'll look into it. How long did it take for you to reproduce the issue? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
