On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:36:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Yuri Niyazov <y...@academia.edu> wrote: > > Should I update the documentation patch to instruct the use of > > pg_controldata exclusively? > > I guess so. Marked as returned with feedback because the thread has died.
I did review this suggestion and concur that there just isn't enough justification to list in the docs everything pg_upgrade checks for compatibility, and a partial list might be worse than no list at all. I agree it would be nice if we could somehow pull the initdb flags out of a PGDATA and use them. The good news is that pg_upgrade --check will do the verification and report any problems, which might be why we have not seems this complained about before. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
