On Mon, Oct  3, 2016 at 10:36:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Yuri Niyazov <y...@academia.edu> wrote:
> > Should I update the documentation patch to instruct the use of
> > pg_controldata exclusively?
> I  guess so. Marked as returned with feedback because the thread has died.

I did review this suggestion and concur that there just isn't enough
justification to list in the docs everything pg_upgrade checks for
compatibility, and a partial list might be worse than no list at all.

I agree it would be nice if we could somehow pull the initdb flags out
of a PGDATA and use them.

The good news is that pg_upgrade --check will do the verification and
report any problems, which might be why we have not seems this
complained about before.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to