Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I propose the attached patch to clean up some redundancy and confusion
> in pg_dump.
Looks sane, though I'd suggest coding the access macros with shifts
Since these numbers are purely internal and not stored in this form in the
file, I wonder whether we shouldn't drop the rightmost zero byte, ie make
it just <maj><min><rev> not <maj><min><rev>00. That would save at least
one divide/shift when accessing.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: