Andreas Seltenreich <seltenre...@gmx.de> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> Seems sane, though I wonder if it'd be better to use -INT_MAX rather >> than -VARBITMAXLEN.
> I am undecided between those two. -INT_MAX might be a more precise fix > for the problem, but the extra distance to the danger zone was kind of > soothing :-). Yeah, might as well use the tighter limit. Poking around in varbit.c, I noticed some other places that were assuming that a typmod couldn't exceed VARBITMAXLEN. anybit_typmodin() enforces that, but there are places where a user can shove in an arbitrary integer, eg regression=# select "bit"(42, 2147483647); ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 18446744073441116169 I fixed those too and pushed it. Thanks for the report! regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers