On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasye...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Some initial comments on optimize_lazy_scan_heap_v2.patch. > > Seems worth pursuing. Marking as returned with feedback because of > lack of activity and some basic reviews sent.
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and sorry for my late reply. I've measured the performance improvement of this patch, but I got the result showing that it can improve vacuum freeze performance 30 sec with 32TB table. I don't think that this patch is worth to pursue any further, so I'd like to withdraw this. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers