On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > What's bothering me is (a) it's less than 24 hours to release wrap and > (b) this patch changes SSI-relevant behavior and hasn't been approved > by Kevin. I'm not familiar enough with that logic to commit a change > in it on my own authority, especially with so little time for problems > to be uncovered.
I should point out that I knew that the next set of point releases had been moved forward much later than you did. I had to work on this fix during the week, which was pretty far from ideal for me for my own reasons. > I'm okay with adding an explicit buffer lock/unlock pair, and in fact > plan to go have a look at that in a bit. I'm not okay with doing a > refactoring that might change the behavior in more ways than that > under these circumstances. Fair enough. As long as we do that much, I'm comfortable. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers