Robert Haas <> writes:
> I'm not interested in committing this patch.  I don't believe it is an
> improvement on what we've got today.
> Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?

I have no objection to this patch as such, but I think that the docs
around FDW direct modify need significantly more work than this.
I've had a to-do item for awhile to work on that, but it hasn't gotten
to the top of the list.

A larger issue is that I think the API itself is poorly designed, as
I stated awhile ago (<>) and was told it
was too late to object.  So that's kind of discouraged me from bothering.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to