Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm not interested in committing this patch. I don't believe it is an > improvement on what we've got today. > Tom, any chance you could offer an opinion?
I have no objection to this patch as such, but I think that the docs around FDW direct modify need significantly more work than this. I've had a to-do item for awhile to work on that, but it hasn't gotten to the top of the list. A larger issue is that I think the API itself is poorly designed, as I stated awhile ago (<31706.1457547...@sss.pgh.pa.us>) and was told it was too late to object. So that's kind of discouraged me from bothering. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers