On 21 October 2016 at 19:38, Vladimir Gordiychuk <fol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Craig, Andres what do you thinks about previous message?
I haven't had a chance to look further to be honest.
Since a downstream disconnect works, though it's ugly, it's not
something I can justify spending a lot of time on, and I already did
spend a lot on it in patch review/updating/testing etc.
I don't know what Andres wants, but I think CopyFail with
ERRCODE_QUERY_CANCELED is fine.
As for plugins that collect changes in memory and only send them on
commit, I'd call them "broken". Not an interesting case IMO. Don't do
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: