On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > The original intent of that patch tried to cover the case where we insert > > records > > made of dozens columns sharing the same type definition, and trying to > > understand > > what is going on, at a glance, when we debugged something like this: > > ... > > Relying on the cursor seems to be of little help I'm afraid. > > Well, it would be an improvement over what we've got now. Also, a feature > similar to what I suggested would help in localizing many types of errors > that have nothing to do with coercion to a target column type. >
Yes, it's a neat improvement in any case. -- Franck Verrot
