On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11/5/16 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut >> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> > On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>>> >> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being >>>> >> addressed now so as they are not forgotten even if there is a FIXME >>>> >> flag added. Perhaps you don't think so, and as that's a minor issue >>>> >> I'll be fine with your judgement as well. >>> > >>> > OK, I just wrapped it in translation markers as is, which should work >>> > well enough. >> Agreed. I don't see anything wrong with that. > > committed and closed the patch
Thanks for adjusting pg_rewind as well. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
