Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't think we need "named constants", especially not >> manually-maintained ones. The thing that would help in pg_proc.h is for >> numeric type OIDs to be replaced by type names. We talked awhile back >> about introducing some sort of preprocessing step that would allow doing >> that --- ie, it would look into some precursor file for pg_type.h and >> extract the appropriate OID automatically. I'm too tired to go find the >> thread right now, but it was mostly about building the long-DATA-lines >> representation from something easier to edit.
> You mean that I guess: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4d191a530911041228v621286a7q6a98d9ab8a2ed...@mail.gmail.com Hmm, that's from 2009. I thought I remembered something much more recent, like last year or so. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers