Robert, * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 3. The operation is judged to have succeeded if at least one permission is > > granted, or NO grants failed (i.e. there was nothing to grant). > > Allow me to be skeptical. If a user types INSERT INTO blah VALUES > (...), (...), (...) should we change the system to report success if > at least 1 of the 3 rows got successfully inserted? I bet that > wouldn't go over well.
To this point, we already do this for GRANT and REVOKE, so if this is going to be based around those commands then it should perform in a similar manner. Of course, that behavior is required for SQL spec and as Tom points out that might be reason enough to avoid actually tying this in with GRANT/REVOKE since we could end up in a tough spot if the SQL committee decides to take a different direction than what we use (or use the keywords we pick for something else). Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature