On 18 Nov. 2016 13:14, "Kyotaro HORIGUCHI" <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Hello. > > We had too-early WAL recycling during a test we had on a sync > replication set. This is not a bug and a bit extreme case but is > contrary to expectation on synchronous replication.
Isn't this prevented by using a physical replication slot? You hint that you looked at slots but they didn't meet your needs in some way. I'm not sure I understood the last part.
