Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Thanks for the report! Looks like the serialization code has overlooked >> the fact that string-valued GUCs can be NULL. Surprising we didn't >> find that before ...
> Why do we allow this, anyway? I think it simplifies some initialization cases. Not sure how hard it would be to remove that. But this isn't the first such bug ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers