Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote:
>> I like the patch because it means less operators to remember for me as a
>> PostgreSQL user. And at least for me inet is a rarely used type compared to
>> hstore, json and range types which all use @> and <@.
> I agree that it would be nice to make the choice of operator names
> more consistent. I don't know if doing so will please more or fewer
> people than it annoys.
Given the lack of support for this idea from the rest of the community,
I think it's time to reject this patch and move on. The inconsistency
is unfortunate but it does not seem worth the costs of changing.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
