On 11/29/16 2:53 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-11-29 12:16:37 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 11/12/16 10:38 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> * Also forbid matching an any-encoding entry. This test of course is
>>>> * backed up by the unique index, but it's not a problem since we don't
>>>> * support adding any-encoding entries after initdb.
>>> Note that this isn't true anymore...
>> I think this is still correct, because the collation import does not
>> produce any any-encoding entries (collencoding = -1).
> Well, the comment "don't support adding any-encoding entries after
> initdb." is now wrong.
I think there is a misunderstanding. The comment says that we don't
support adding encodings that have collencoding = -1 after initdb. That
is still true. Note that the original comment as two "any"'s. With
this patch, we would now support adding collations with collencoding <>
-1 after initdb.
>>>> +Datum pg_import_system_collations(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
>> Required to avoid compiler warning about missing prototype.
> It seems not to be project style to have prototypes in the middle of the
OK, will fix.
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: