On 09/28/2016 11:55 AM, Mithun Cy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
Adding the rebased patch over  + 
As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch
needs a rebase.
I have moved this submission to the next CF.
Thanks for working on this !
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: