On 09/28/2016 11:55 AM, Mithun Cy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
of wal
Adding the rebased patch over [1] + [2]
As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch
needs a rebase.
I have moved this submission to the next CF.
Thanks for working on this !
Best regards,
Jesper
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
