On 09/28/2016 11:55 AM, Mithun Cy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
 > I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
of wal

Adding the rebased patch over [1] + [2]

As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch needs a rebase.

I have moved this submission to the next CF.

Thanks for working on this !

Best regards,

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to