On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11/30/16 8:06 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> On 30/11/16 22:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I have taken the libpqwalreceiver refactoring patch and split it into >>> two: one for the latch change, one for the API change. I have done some >>> mild editing. >>> >>> These two patches are now ready to commit in my mind. > >> Hi, looks good to me, do you plan to commit this soon or would you >> rather me to resubmit the patches rebased on top of this (and including >> this) first? > > committed those two
Commit 597a87ccc9a6fa8af7f3cf280b1e24e41807d555 left some comments behind that referred to the select() that it removed. Maybe rewrite like in the attached? I wonder if it would be worth creating and reusing a WaitEventSet here. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
comments.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
