Hello,

Sorry for the changing the status of the patch against to the current status. While going through the recent mails, I thought that there is some disagreement from committer.

If so, I'm willing to explain again why these operators are useful for writing some benchmarks, for instance, this paragraph taken randomly from the TPC-B specification, on page 16:

"""
  The Account_ID is generated as follows:
  • A random number X is generated within [0,1]
  • If X<0.85 or branches = 1, a random Account_ID is selected over all 
<Branch_ID> accounts.
  • If X>=0.85 and branches > 1, a random Account_ID is selected over all 
non-<Branch_ID> accounts.
"""

This extracy suggests clearly that having some comparison operators and some ability to act upon the comparison result is required to implement this particular benchmark, which is beyond pgbench current capabilities.

Moved to next CF with "ready for committer" status.

Ok. We'll see next time what becomes of it...

--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to