2016-12-09 18:00 GMT+05:00 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > It looks like this could be reworked as a client of Peter Eisentraut's > background sessions code, which I think is also derived from > pg_background: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/e1c2d331-ee6a-432d-e9f5-dcf85cffa...@2ndquadrant.com > > That might be good, because then we wouldn't have to maintain two > copies of the code.
Code looks quite different. I mean bgsession.c code and pg_background.c code. Definitly, there is possibility to refactor both patches to have common subset of base routines, they operate with similar concepts. But to start, it's better to choose which patch goes first, or merge them. There is no possibility to make one on base of other since they both require some work. Personally, I like C code from pg_background more. It is far better commented and has more exceptions info for user. But interface of bgsessions is crispier. Finally, they solve different problems. I signed up for review there too (in background sessions patch). I hope I'll have enough resources to provide decent review for both in december, before commitfest. Best regards, Andrey Borodin. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers