On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached latest v12 patch.
> I changed behavior of "N (standby_list)" to use the priority method
> and incorporated some review comments so far. Please review it.
Some comments...
+ Another example of <varname>synchronous_standby_names</> for multiple
+ synchronous standby is:
Here standby takes an 's'.
+ candidates. The master server will wait for at least 2 replies from them.
+ <literal>s4</> is an asynchronous standby since its name is not in the
list.
+ </para>
"will wait for replies from at least two of them".
+ * next-highest-priority standby. In quorum method, the all standbys
+ * appearing in the list are considered as a candidate for quorum commit.
"the all" is incorrect. I think you mean "all the" instead.
+ * NIL if no sync standby is connected. In quorum method, all standby
+ * priorities are same, that is 1. So this function returns the list of
This is not true. Standys have a priority number assigned. Though it does
not matter much for quorum groups, it gives an indication of their position
in the defined list.
#synchronous_standby_names = '' # standby servers that provide sync rep
- # number of sync standbys and comma-separated list of
application_name
+ # synchronization method, number of sync standbys
+ # and comma-separated list of application_name
# from standby(s); '*' = all
The formulation is funny here: "sync rep synchronization method".
I think that Fujii-san has also some doc changes in his box. For anybody
picking up this patch next, it would be good to incorporate the things
I have noticed here.
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
