Antonin Houska <a...@cybertec.at> wrote:
> It seems to be my bug. I'll check tomorrow.
I could reproduce the problem by adding sufficient sleep time to the
loop.
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
>> I wonder if the else if (sleep > 0) at the bottom of throttle() should just
>> be a simple else and always run, resetting last_throttle?
I agree. In fact, I could simplify the code even more.
Since (elapsed + sleep) almost equals to GetCurrentIntegerTimestamp(), we can
use the following statement unconditionally (I think I tried too hard to avoid
calling GetCurrentIntegerTimestamp too often in the original patch):
throttled_last = GetCurrentIntegerTimestamp();
Thus we can also get rid of the "else" branch that clears both "sleep" and
"wait_result".
(The patch contains minor comment refinement that I found useful when seeing
the code after years.)
--
Antonin Houska
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de, http://www.cybertec.at
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/basebackup.c b/src/backend/replication/basebackup.c
new file mode 100644
index ffc7e58..40b3c11
*** a/src/backend/replication/basebackup.c
--- b/src/backend/replication/basebackup.c
*************** throttle(size_t increment)
*** 1370,1395 ****
if (wait_result & WL_LATCH_SET)
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
}
- else
- {
- /*
- * The actual transfer rate is below the limit. A negative value
- * would distort the adjustment of throttled_last.
- */
- wait_result = 0;
- sleep = 0;
- }
/*
! * Only a whole multiple of throttling_sample was processed. The rest will
! * be done during the next call of this function.
*/
throttling_counter %= throttling_sample;
! /* Once the (possible) sleep has ended, new period starts. */
! if (wait_result & WL_TIMEOUT)
! throttled_last += elapsed + sleep;
! else if (sleep > 0)
! /* Sleep was necessary but might have been interrupted. */
! throttled_last = GetCurrentIntegerTimestamp();
}
--- 1370,1385 ----
if (wait_result & WL_LATCH_SET)
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
}
/*
! * As we work with integers, only whole multiple of throttling_sample was
! * processed. The rest will be done during the next call of this function.
*/
throttling_counter %= throttling_sample;
! /*
! * Time interval for the remaining amount and possible next increments
! * starts now.
! */
! throttled_last = GetCurrentIntegerTimestamp();
}
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
