On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> When the number of sync standbys is set to 0 in s_s_names, the assersion
>> failure happens as follows. This means that current multiple syncrep code
>> assumes that the num of sync standbys must be greater than 0. But we forgot
>> to forbid users from setting that num to 0. This is an oversight in multiple
>> syncrep patch (so my fault...). Attached patch forbits that.
> Ooops.  Patch looks fine to me.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.


Fujii Masao

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to