On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 20:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and
> > handle autocommit in the client?
> Hmm ... that's a thought ... not very backwards-compatible with 7.3,
> but I think I like it better than continuing on with the GUC option.
> As you say, that path is looking messier all the time.

Yes, definitely -- replacing the 7.3 GUC option would be great, that's a
pretty bad hack IMHO.



Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to