Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Even if we decide to keep the message, I think it's not very good > > wording anyhow; as a translator I disliked it on sight. Instead of > > "skipping scan to validate" I would use "skipping validation scan", > > except that it's not clear what it is we're validating. Mentioning > > partition constraint in errcontext() doesn't like a great solution, but > > I can't think of anything better. > > Maybe something like: partition constraint for table \"%s\" is implied > by existing constraints
Actually, shouldn't we emit a message if we *don't* skip the check? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
