Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: > On 12/21/2016 08:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I propose that we should change that string to "could not obtain message >> string for error on connection "foo"", or something along that line. >> >> postgres_fdw has the same disease. It wouldn't have the notion of a named >> connection, but maybe we could insert the foreign server name instead.
> Seems reasonable to me. I can work on it if you'd like. Do you think > this should be backpatched? If you have time for it, please do, I have lots on my plate already. I'd vote for back-patching; the benefits of a clearer error message are obvious, and it hardly seems likely that any existing applications are depending on this specific error string. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers