At Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:02:11 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
wrote in <cab7npqssbzhokcxybh9_zguenr0hckrcpc9dmk6vvcgbez1...@mail.gmail.com>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >> On 2016-12-22 08:32:56 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> I plan to commit this later today. Hope I got the reviewers roughly
> >>> right.
> >> And pushed. Thanks for the work on this everyone.
> > Cool. Also, +1 for the important/unimportant terminology. I like that.
> Thanks for the commit.
Thanks for commiting.
By the way this issue seems beeing in the ToDo list.
> Consider avoiding WAL switching via archive_timeout if there
> has been no database activity
> - archive_timeout behavior for no activity
> - Re: archive_timeout behavior for no activity
So I marked it as "done".
NTT Open Source Software Center
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: