* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > > > The only functional issue might be the removal of the IsA() checks. If > > > we don't cast any Node before passing it to any of those functions, > > > there should be no problem because any misfeasance will be reported as a > > > compile-time warning. Perhaps it's worth adding IsA() checks in loops > > > such as the one in roleSpecsToIds(). > > > > Maybe inside of an Assert() though..? > > Yeah, I was of two minds when writing that para. Maybe roleSpecsToIds > (and all similar functions, if any others exist) has a limited enough > caller base that it's trivial to audit that no bogus callsite exists.
Well, I think an Assert() is fine to make sure someone doesn't add a new call that passes in something else where we don't have the compile-time type checking happening. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
