On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> So perhaps I should get rid of that replication_lag_sample_interval
> GUC and send back apply timestamps frequently, as you were saying.  It
> would add up to a third more replies.

Oops, of course I meant to say up to 50% more replies...

Thomas Munro

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to