On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > So perhaps I should get rid of that replication_lag_sample_interval > GUC and send back apply timestamps frequently, as you were saying. It > would add up to a third more replies.
Oops, of course I meant to say up to 50% more replies... -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
