Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think probably the right thing for now is to install a do-nothing
>> callback, so that at least we don't have the issue of the postmaster
>> freezing at SIGHUP. If someone feels like trying to revive support
>> of passphrase-protected server keys, that would be a perfectly fine
>> base to build on; they'd need a callback there anyway.
> Does it still support passphrase protected ones on startup, or did that get
> thrown out with the bathwater?
It does not; what would be the point, if the key would be lost at SIGHUP?
> I think that's definitely a separate thing
> and there are a nontrivial number of people who would be interested in a
> setup where they can use a passphrase to protect it initially, just not
> reload it.
If any of those number of people want to step up and design/implement
a non-broken solution for passphrases, that'd be fine with me. But
I would want to see something that's actually a credible solution,
allowing the postmaster to be started as a normal daemon. And working
on Windows.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
