Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > No, I think backend-lifetime is right. The tranche registrations are > all backend-local state, so there's no problem with backend A > registering a string at one address and backend B registering a string > at a different address. It's just important that neither of those > strings goes away before the corresponding backend does.
Then I don't understand what's going on. Isn't the crash you fixed because backend A was looking at the tranche containing the lock backend B was blocked on? How can a tranche name local to backend B work? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers