Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> No, I think backend-lifetime is right. The tranche registrations are
> all backend-local state, so there's no problem with backend A
> registering a string at one address and backend B registering a string
> at a different address. It's just important that neither of those
> strings goes away before the corresponding backend does.
Then I don't understand what's going on. Isn't the crash you fixed
because backend A was looking at the tranche containing the lock backend B
was blocked on? How can a tranche name local to backend B work?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
