On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > <Argh, wrong sender again, sorry [again] for the repost. > I must tweak my mail client configuration...> > > >>>Good. So we seem to agree that GUCS are transactional? > > > >I'm surprised, I never knew this. > > I must admit that it was also a (good) surprise for me. > > The documentation says it: > > """ > If SET (or equivalently SET SESSION) is issued within a transaction that is > later aborted, the effects of the SET command disappear when the transaction > is rolled back. Once the surrounding transaction is committed, the effects > will persist until the end of the session, unless overridden by another SET. > """ > > But I have not found anything clear about user-defined parameters.
Uh, I think it is a missing feature, i.e.: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Administration Have custom variables be transaction-safe https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4b577e9f.8000...@dunslane.net -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers