On 1/9/17 5:12 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
Agreed: If you want to break compatibility, pushing a new language is
the better way than GUC. If you got consensus on this, having both
languages side by side supported for a while (maybe 4-5 releases) is
they way to go, and finally the only language is frozen and moved to
extension. But this is a lot of work and aggravation, are you *sure*
you can only get what you want with a full compatibility break?
FWIW, that work and aggravation part is what I hoped to avoid with GUCs.
I do think that whichever route we go, we're going to be stuck
supporting the old version for a LONG time. A big part of why
standard_conforming_strings was so ugly is users didn't have enough time
to adjust. If we'd had that enabled by default for 4-5 releases it
wouldn't have been nearly as much of an issue.
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: