Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> I don't think there are a lto of people who use dead tree editions anymore, >>> but they certainly do exist. A lot of people use the PDFs though, >>> particularly for offline reading or loading them in ebook readers. So it >>> still has to be workable there.
>> PDFs do have hyperlinks, so that in itself isn't an argument for keeping >> the dead-tree-friendly approach. However, I've noticed some variation >> among tools in whether a PDF hyperlink is visibly distinct, or whether >> you have to mouse over it to find out that it would take you somewhere. >> Not sure if that's enough of a usability fail to argue for keeping the >> old way. > Personally, I wouldn't sweat it. Um ... are you expressing an opinion on the question at hand (ie, whether to continue using "see section m.n"-type cross-references), and if so in which direction? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers